A discussion on behavior change ( Part I )
I had a very interesting discussion with a frustrated resident.
After dealing with a difficult patient with multiple chronic diseases, he
expressed frustration about patients that don't follow through with
our recommendations. He took a big step in identifying some of the
problems in how we counsel patients.
When we see
a patient we are quick (and good) at pointing out all the bad things that could
happen if a behavior change isn't adopted.
”If
we don't do a better job controlling your diabetes, X, Y and Z could
happen."
This is what our
current training in medicine advocates. Our education revolves around the
diseased state, how to treat it, how to cure it and to a lesser degree, how to
prevent it. And when we talk about prevention, the motivation is based
on what the physician values. In this case the physician values the”X, Y & Z" outcomes, but patients may not put
as much stock in that.
The resident
suggested shifting motivation to what the patient values.
“If we
do a better job controlling your diabetes, you will feel better."
“If we do a
better job controlling your diabetes, you are more likely to make it to your
grandson's wedding."
This was terrific
insight from a young, inexperienced doctor. And with that, he touched on one of
the sentinel questions in modern medicine. What is the best way to enact
behavior change in medicine?
There are several
elements to it. The most fundamental prerequisite is to know your patients well
and what they value. By understanding what they value, we can tailor
behavioral change advice that is meaningful on a personal level and therefore
more likely to succeed. This is a fundamental concept in how we should be
practicing medicine. It is also a concept we don't emphasize enough in
medical school and residency training.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home